You are here: Home >> English News & Features >> Top News

3 blasts, 11 years, over 60 dead, but cops botch case

DNMUM383403 | 2/17/2017 | Author : Richa Banka | WC :425 | India



New Delhi: Even 11 years after the deadly blasts claimed 67 lives and injured 225 people in Delhi in 2005, there is no relief for the families of the victims who lost their loved ones.
A Delhi court slammed the prosecution for the shoddy investigation, saying it “failed miserably” in proving the charges.
The court found nothing to prove that the three accused - Mohammed Hussain Fazili, Rafiq Shah and Tariq Ahmed Dar - either planted the bombs or hatched a terror conspiracy.
While Shah, an MA student in Kashmir University, and Fazili were acquitted of all charges, Dar, the alleged mastermind, was convicted to 10-year imprisonment under Sections 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for suppor
Read full story


Copyright restricted. Under license from www.dnasyndication.com   
Add To Lightbox
Calculate Price

More on Top News

In Mumbai, Brand Trump pumps up realty prices
DNDEL15850 | 2/23/2018 12:00:00 AM | Author : Sudhir Suryawanshi | WC :398

Trump towerper sq-ftper sq-ftMumbai: Shakespeare might ask ‘what’s in the name?’ But those who want to buy properties at the Trump Tower in Parel will disagree. They are paying a whopping Rs 18,000 per sq-ft more for an abode in the property that bea
Add To LightboxCalculate Price

Clash of judges again at SC, this
DNDEL15851 | 2/23/2018 12:00:00 AM | Author : DNA Correspondent | WC :384

time over a land acquisition caseNew Delhi: Two Supreme Court benches of three judges each arrived at conflicting conclusions in a land acquisition case, leading the matter to be referred to Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra for constituting an “app
Add To LightboxCalculate Price

Clash of judges again at SC, this time over land case
DNMUM408436 | 2/23/2018 12:00:00 AM | Author : DNA Correspondent | WC :341

New Delhi: Two Supreme Court benches of three judges each arrived at conflicting conclusions in a land acquisition case, leading the matter to be referred to Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra for constituting an “appropriate bench” to deal with the
Add To LightboxCalculate Price

SC: Can court void a marriage by consent?
DNDEL15852 | 2/23/2018 12:00:00 AM | Author : DNA Correspondent | WC :216

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked if a court can question the validity of a marriage between two consenting adults and if the Kerala High Court order annulling the marriage of Hadiya, an alleged victim of ‘love jihad’, was justified.
Add To LightboxCalculate Price